Foreign News

Australia says Indo-Pacific and NATO security are ‘inseparable’ as it deepens defence ties

Published

on

The security of the Indo-Pacific and the North Atlantic can no longer be viewed separately, Australia’s Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said, arguing that modern conflicts demand closer cooperation between NATO and partners in Asia.

Speaking to TRT World on the sidelines of the NATO Summit in Ankara, Conroy said the changing nature of warfare had reinforced Australia’s commitment to working more closely with the alliance.

“The Indo-Pacific and the North Atlantic are inseparable,” Conroy told TRT World. “All wars are now global, so it is in all our interests to work together to deter conflict.”

His remarks encapsulate Australia’s central message at this year’s NATO Summit, where the Indo-Pacific Four (IP4) — Australia, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand — joined alliance leaders to discuss security challenges stretching from Europe to Asia.

Australia has steadily deepened its relationship with NATO over the past two decades, evolving from being an important partner in the Afghanistan mission into one of the alliance’s closest Indo-Pacific partners. Today, cooperation spans defence industrial development, cyber security, emerging technologies, resilience and support for Ukraine through NATO initiatives. 

During the NATO Defence Industry Forum, Conroy argued that strengthening industrial capacity has become just as important as increasing defence spending.

“If every country in NATO and every country in the Indo-Pacific is increasing defence spending, but we’re not growing the industrial base, we’re simply going to pay a lot more for the same amount of equipment,” he said.

Australia, he noted, is undertaking the largest peacetime increase in defence spending in its history, with defence expenditure reaching 2.8 percent of GDP this year. Canberra is also restructuring its defence bureaucracy by transferring around 40 percent of its defence budget into a dedicated capability delivery agency aimed at accelerating procurement and innovation.

Rather than relying solely on domestic production, Australia is pursuing what Conroy described as a model of “co-design, co-development, co-production and co-sustainment” with trusted partners.

He pointed to joint programmes with Germany on Boxer combat reconnaissance vehicles, Canada on over-the-horizon radar and Norway on Naval Strike Missile production as examples of a more integrated defence industrial strategy.

Advertisement

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending

Exit mobile version