Africa’s tobacco policy failure: Illicit trade grows, harm reduction stalls – EnviroNews

– Advertisement –

As 2026 draws to a close, Africa’s tobacco policy landscape presents a troubling contradiction. Illicit cigarette markets continue to expand, governments lose billions in potential tax revenue, and millions of adult smokers face limited access to potentially less harmful nicotine alternatives.

Despite years of tobacco-control legislation, Africa has struggled to show meaningful progress. The continent appears increasingly trapped in a cycle of restrictive policies that fail to address the realities of its tobacco markets.

Kenya offers a striking example. Estimates reported in November 2026 put illicit cigarettes at approximately 45 per cent of the country’s cigarette market in 2025, representing an estimated KSh10.2 billion in lost excise revenue. South Africa faces an equally serious challenge, with estimates placing illicit cigarettes at nearly 60 per cent or more of its market.

These figures raise important questions about the effectiveness of existing policies. Excessive taxation, regulatory uncertainty, weak enforcement, and complicated compliance requirements can create opportunities for illegal operators. When legitimate products become increasingly expensive or difficult to access, illicit suppliers are often better positioned to exploit the resulting market gaps.

Yet, while governments struggle to contain illegal cigarette markets, safer nicotine alternatives face mounting regulatory barriers.

Vapes, heated tobacco products and nicotine pouches offer adult smokers alternatives to combustible cigarettes. Although none is risk-free, products that eliminate combustion can substantially reduce exposure to many harmful chemicals associated with smoking.

Nevertheless, across Africa, these products face bans, excessive taxation, flavor restrictions, and regulatory uncertainty. Kenya’s proposed Tobacco Control (Amendment) Bill 2024, for example, has raised concerns about restrictions that could limit access to emerging nicotine alternatives. Similar regulatory questions are emerging in Nigeria and elsewhere.

The contradiction is difficult to ignore: governments are struggling to control combustible cigarettes while making it harder for adult smokers to access alternatives that could help them move away from smoking.

Africa also risks falling behind international developments. Countries such as Sweden and the United Kingdom offer important lessons about differentiated nicotine regulation and the potential role of alternative products in reducing smoking. African governments should examine such experiences and develop policies suited to their own economic and public health circumstances.

The consequences of getting this wrong extend beyond public health. Unpredictable regulation discourages legitimate investment, weakens compliant businesses, undermines tax collection and creates opportunities for illegal operators.

A different direction for 2027

Africa needs a more pragmatic approach. Governments should strengthen border controls, improve tracking systems and cooperate regionally to combat cigarette smuggling and counterfeiting. Taxation must be realistic, proportionate and sensitive to illicit-market dynamics.

Equally important, nicotine products should be regulated according to their characteristics and relative risks rather than treated as identical to combustible cigarettes. Strong age restrictions, product standards, quality controls and responsible marketing rules can protect consumers without unnecessarily restricting adult choice.

Advertisement