Published
3 hours agoon
By
MAIN
Britain’s approval of China’s plans to build a large new embassy in London is facing a legal challenge, with local residents arguing that authorities failed to properly assess the potential impact on protests and the safety of dissidents.
The proposed embassy, planned for the historic Royal Mint Court site near the Tower of London, was approved in January, shortly before Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s visit to China, the first trip by a British leader to the country since 2018.
The decision was taken with a view to improving ties with Beijing despite British and U.S. politicians warning that it could be used as a base for spying. Britain’s intelligence agencies said any threat could be mitigated.
Concerns Over Surveillance Risks
Local residents argue that officials failed to take into account the risk that the new embassy could curtail protests or be used to monitor and intimidate Chinese dissidents.
The case at London’s High Court is being brought by the Royal Mint Court Residents’ Association (RMCRA), representing a group of families and businesses who live in and operate from leasehold properties built at Royal Mint Court.
The RMCRA’s lawyers said in court filings that ministers should have taken steps to “prevent the property becoming a major base for ‘transnational repression’”.
They also argue that conditions imposed on the new embassy cannot be enforced as diplomatic premises are protected, citing a 2022 incident when a protester was beaten and dragged inside the grounds of the Chinese consulate in Manchester and an earlier breach of planning law at the consulate in Belfast.
UK-China Tensions Persist
But lawyers representing Britain’s housing minister Steve Reed said the RMCRA was simply trying to re-run arguments which were properly considered when approving the embassy.
The case comes amid concerns about alleged Chinese espionage, after two dual Chinese-British nationals were convicted in May of spying on Hong Kong dissidents and jailed last month.
The Chinese embassy in London has vehemently denied the allegations, previously describing the convictions as “a political move of abusing the law” and warnings of an espionage threat as “malicious slander”.
(With inputs from Reuters)
